- #Email obfuscator tool how to
- #Email obfuscator tool manual
- #Email obfuscator tool code
- #Email obfuscator tool series
If any bugs found, or to send comments, please see the contact section. IĬannot assure it will run smoothly on other systems due to the many file operations that are used, that can be different across various This system has been tested on a 32-bit Windows XP machine, and a Mac PowerBook G4. Libraries are available in the other folders.
#Email obfuscator tool how to
Please click here for a walkthrough on how to use the tool. The command line (or in some systems by double clicking its icon). jar file in the home directory that can be run using the command >java -jar Obfuscator.jar from There is an ant build file called build.xml in the home directory.Here for the direct link to the download page. The main SourceForge project page where you can download the release from, or click This project is currently hosted by SourceForge. To harvest your email and flood your inbox with spam. Using the general guidelines and the obfuscators provided will make your web pages much safer from spammers being able Various obfuscatorsĪre available to choose from as described below, and it is very simple to add new obfuscators to theįramework. tar.gz) of HTML pages by hiding, or obfuscating, the email addresses that appear within those pages. This is a stand-alone tool written in Java that can be used to process single html pages, or archives (currently supports. Information about Email Validation Used.
#Email obfuscator tool code
General Advice about Writing Spam Resistant Code.Download, Installation, and Usage Instructions.
My method of doing an each time random method works very well, I have yet to get any spam on my account.Email Obfuscator: Anti Spam Tool for Websites Table Of Contents There are some harvesters that do try to process JS, but like I said it is very costly when you are running millions of emails in a matter of minutes, you don't want to go down to 10s or 100s if you can do 1000s. Making those methods more costly for harvesters. Most harvesters are not Javascript aware, that is they do not process JS. This does not really apply to small mom & pop websites who might use a myriad of obfuscation methods, or sites where users post different format emails in a variety of email obfuscation ways (omitting the. You would be surprised how well this method works, sure some methods are compromised and easily broken, but more elaborate methods of email obfuscation usually make the harvesting pointless as the sheer amount of pattern detection would require a lot of invested resources.īrute force of CAPTCHAS is different, where the hackers/spammers/harvesters TARGET a specific site. So an email never really looks like an email, and the pattern ALWAYS changes.
#Email obfuscator tool series
The thing that is usually done is non JS encoded, plain text emails are harvested (check any 1-2 year old website that is unchanged, and I bet you $20 bucks its plain text email and they get tons of spam).Īt my company all the external facing emails are obfuscated using a series of server side & JS client side methods.
#Email obfuscator tool manual
Of course nothing stops manual harvesting, but that is very low. Yes it is true in most cases because you need a pattern for email harvesting, the more complex the pattern the more expensive (time/money) it is for spammers to work at getting emails. So, to answer the question: Yes, (in a way) email obfuscation works. Plain Text 21 MB is the original statistical graph made by Silvan Mühlemann, all credit goes towards him: Replacing and '.' with Entities 1.6 MB E-Mail with comments 7.1 MB 7.9 MB xyz% M += '' // and then add it to the DOM (eg, via M += // creating the string containing the email Nine ways to obfuscate e-mail addresses comparedĬSS Codedirection 0 MB spam display:none 0 MB Encryption 0 MB ATs and DOTs 0.084 MB xyz AT example DOT comīuilding with Javascript 0.144 MB var m = 'xyz' // you can use any clever method of Some time ago I stumbled upon the post of someone who created a honeypot and waited for differently obsfucated email-addresses coming back: